Is Jordan Binnington a Question Mark or The Answer?

As another year of hockey has already reached its mid-point, the St. Louis Blues have, once again, found themselves in the middle of a predicament involving their two rostered net-minders.

Now, if you follow me on twitter, you can probably assume what alignment I side with in regards to who I think the Blues should be starting next game, but that’s not to say I don’t support Jake Allen when he’s in net or recognize what he’s done or been through with this club.

In 2014 in his first full season with the Blues, Allen went 22-7 posting a .913 SV% and shutout the opposition 4 times and in 2015 he went 26-15 while posting a career high .920 SV%.

Comparing just those statistics alone, it should be easy to take the blame off a goaltenders shoulders for the sole reason why a team is losing, seemingly, game after game. If your goalie is showing out with a .920 SV% and the teams not showing up with goal support, it doesn’t matter if he’s “batting” 1.000, you’ll just lose in the shootout. It takes a balance and the team wasn’t doing their part.

At the end of January 2016, the season Jake Allen single handedly defeated the Minnesota Wild in the 1st round, Jake posted a .897 SV%  with 2.85 GAA ( his numbers, as of January 9th, 2019, currently sit at .896/3.07). This is not an unfathomable, deteriorated version of #34 that we’re seeing right now. He’s the same goaltender he’s always been, but either the team in front isn’t doing their job or the defensive scheme is too complex. But, to blame Allen entirely for this teams, albeit depressing, regression is simply unfair.

I don’t believe Jake is a bad goalie, I don’t believe hes a good goalie. There are plenty of goalies in the league who go on spells where their net seems untouchable. It’s been proven with Jake, it’s been proven with Holtby, it’s being proven right now with John Gibson for Anaheim. The problem, as many have stated over and over, is that Jake isn’t consistent enough.

I don’t think Jake Allen is anything more than an average-slightly above average goaltender in this league and, if he played like that on a consistent basis, he’d be more than adequate moving forward as our starting goalie. He just has too many peaks in play where he’s outstanding and valleys where pucks seemingly pass through him that you never really know which one of the three versions of Jake you’re going to get night in and night out. That being said, for this team to succeed under him, they either need to either play lockdown defense and a full 60 minutes, or they have to bank on the incredible Allen to show up to bail them out which, 1 out of 3, leaves them at a 33% chance of that happening.

Mentally, being the scapegoat for fans year after year, has most likely taken a toll on him and a change of scenery would be mutually beneficial for both parties involved, however difficult that might be to finagle.

Now, let’s talk about Jordan Binnington.

Jordan Binnington is not an attractive, Corey Pronman’s Top 100 prospect. He’s an experienced 25 year old goalie who has developed his game and been a pillar of consistency for the multiple teams he’s played for.

Selected in the 3rd round of the 2011 NHL Draft, the 6’2 Ontario native played for the Owen Sound Attack. In 2012, he went 32-12 for them, with a .932 SV%, 2.17 GAA, and 7 shutouts (he holds the franchise record, for which, at 10), which earned him an invitation to the World Juniors Canadian team.

He was promoted to start with the Blues AHL affiliates in 2014 and, since that time, has not had a seasonal SV% sub .907, with his numbers consistently near .920.

screenshot (38)

This year, for the San Antonio Rampage, Jordan is 11-4 with a .927 SV%, 2.08 GAA, and 3 shutouts in 16 games. In his last four games, he’s faced 125 shots and denied 122 of them good for a .976 SV%.

After finding out he was 1 of 2 goaltenders to record a shutout in their NHL debut in Blues franchise history, Binnington told Fox Sports Midwest reporter Darren Pang it was, “cool”.

What’s really “cool” is the ice in his veins, the calm and collected way he plays the puck, and that a player who has worked at his craft through four different leagues and eight different teams over a ten year span could finally get a chance to make himself a household name.

Follow me on twitter here for all things St. Louis Blues.
Advertisements

One thought on “Is Jordan Binnington a Question Mark or The Answer?

  1. He’s still a question mark, but Allen hasn’t earned any preferential treatment. This season is lost, may as well play Binnington & see what he can do. Could hardly do worse

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s